The free audit ranks the gaps and the first workflow closes one. The Sprint closes the rest. I embed for 120 days, build the software inside your stack, and train your team to run it. You own everything I build.
The 120-Day Sprint is an embedded build-and-enablement engagement for TikTok Shop brands. It starts from the audit, builds the software that closes each remaining gap inside your existing stack, and trains your team to own and run the systems after handoff.
Budget stays on videos past their peak because nobody grades creatives against spend every week.
Affiliates who converted stop posting, and the drop only shows up in GMV months later.
Free product goes to creators who never publish, and nobody can quote the sample-to-post rate.
Invites go out at volume, follow-ups do not, and the likeliest yeses sit in a list nobody reopens.
Representative systems from brand engagements. The first-month audit produces a gap-to-automation backlog, so what gets built first is what your operation actually needs first.
Approvals run on rules you set, a GMV floor, one sample per creator, a cooldown, instead of follower count and gut feel. They run every weekday without anyone opening the queue.
A score per affiliate against their own trailing three months, so the slide is visible the week it starts, while a message or a new sample can still bring them back.
Every creative graded against spend and cost per order each week, with a verdict: scale, replace, maintain, or cut, on your own numbers before the next budget cycle.
Invites that get a second and third touch automatically, inside the outreach tool you already use, so the likeliest yeses stop sitting in a list nobody reopens.
Which samples became videos, which creators post and which never do, and what that costs, so the approval rules get sharper every month.
Numbers pulled from your TikTok Shop data and written up before Monday: affiliate GMV, creators, samples, ads. Your team reads it instead of building it.
Which hooks and angles are converting across creator videos this week, so briefs point creators at what is already working.
SOPs per system, a prompt library, training, and a QA step so your team runs and changes the rules without me.
Signal that used to sit in a dozen tools lands in one place, so the next call gets made on what you actually know.
A moving creator gets flagged, briefed, and queued at hours nobody is paid to be watching.
When reporting writes itself and tasks assign themselves, the time you kept promising to strategy actually exists.
Have the technical people and just want the coaching? That's AI Advisory.
120 days, embedded. What happens after the build arc is agreed on the call, once you have seen what the first systems do.
Yours. The systems are built inside the tools your team already uses, which is why they survive the handoff. There is no new platform to migrate to and no login to adopt.
You do. Everything is documented in Drive and GitHub, your operators are trained on each system, and the final phase is a full handoff. This is a build and enablement engagement.
The build sits with me. Your team joins the audit interviews in the first two weeks, reviews the backlog line by line, and takes training as each system ships. The point is to add capability without adding a second job.
No. Nobody honest can promise GMV. What the engagement commits to is working systems, a trained team, and documented ownership at handoff.
No. An agency runs the account with its own people. I build the systems inside your stack, train your team to run them, and the work stays with you when the 120 days end.
120 days. Embedded. You own the systems I build. Billing and what comes after the build arc are agreed on the first call.